Main Article Content
Background: As the Republic of Kazakhstan undertakes new public health efforts to promote healthy lifestyles among its citizens, the local perceptions of health and health behaviors need to be examined and understood from the sociocultural and historical perspectives. The primary aim of this study is to examine the association between perception of control on one’s health and engagement in good and bad health behaviors.
Methods: Students enrolled in a health communication course surveyed 310 citizens of Kazakhstan on their perceptions of control over their own health and multiple health behaviors (i.e. smoking status, physical activity, etc.). Twenty-seven students were divided into groups and approached every third passerby as a potential participant during common shopping hours in nine popular marketplaces in Astana, Kazakhstan. Perception of control on one’s health was measured using a validated measure of health control: the multidimensional health locus of control scale (MHLC), developed by Wallston and colleagues. The MHLC measures three separate loci of control: internal, chance, and powerful others.
Results: Participants perceived themselves as having highest control over their health (MHLC subscale internal: 29.70±0.64), powerful others had second highest control (MHLC subscale power others: 23.72±0.77), and chance had the lowest but still some control on their health (MHLC subscale chance: 20.82±0.85). Most participants rated their current health as very good (18.1%), good (45.0%), or moderate (32.3%). Approximately 23.4% of participants were smokers, and 22.2% consumed alcohol. Physical activity averaged 3.63 days in the past week, and fruit and vegetable consumption averaged 2 servings of each per day. Tobacco and the powerful others subscale were significantly negatively correlated (r=-0.17, p<0.05).
Conclusions: Participant reports regarding personal health behaviors and lifestyle did not reflect the national reports regarding lifestyle behaviors. The relationship between powerful others subscale and tobacco smoking indicate that using healthcare providers may open up avenues to lowering tobacco use through patient education; however, social desirability is a notable concern for public health interventions. More importantly, the surveys uncovered future questions for conducting public health research with the general public, including issues of trust in the healthcare system and social desirability bias. Additional factors such as distrust in healthcare and government also may play a role in the public’s participation in social scientific research. The students who conducted the surveys reported a general skepticism from the public ranging from unfamiliarity with survey research to explicit distrust in the intentions and purpose of the research itself.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Bobak M, Pikhart, H, Rose, R, Hertzman, C, Marmot, M. Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Soc Sci & Med. 2000;51:1343-1350.
Sharman A. A new paradigm of primary health care in Kazakhstan: Personalized, community-based, standardized, and technology-driven. Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2014;3(1).
Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1992;6(3):197-205.
Vaughn L, Jacquez, F, Baker, RC. Cultural health attributions, beliefs, and practices: Effects on healthcare and medical education. Open Med Ed J. 2009;2:64-74.
Steptoe A W, J. . Health behavior, risk awareness and emotional well-being in students from Eastern Europe and Western Europe. Soc Sci & Med. 2001;53:1622-1630.
Wrightson K, Wardle, J. Cultural variation in health locus of control. Ethnicity and Health. 1997;2:13-20.
Lundell H NJ, Clarke, C. Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality. J Health Comm: Intern Pers. 2013;0:1-15.
Bond A, Beresford, G. Healthcare development in the former Soviet Union Postgrad Medical J. 2003;79:551-552.
Perlman F, Bobak, M, Steptoe, A, Rose, R, Marmot, M. Do health control beliefs predict behavior in Russians? Prev Med. 2003;37:73-81.
Orynbassarova D. Family Medicine as a Model of Primary Health Services Delivery: A Pilot Study in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Cent Asian J of Glob Health. 2015;4(1).
Reilly J, Methven E, McDowell Z, et al. Health consequences of obesity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2003;88(9):748-752.
Wallston K, Wallston, BS, DeVellis, R. Development of multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Ed Mon. 1978;6:160-170.
Wallston K. The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales. J Health Psych. 2005;10:623-631.
Johnson TP vdVF. Social desirability in cross-cultural research. In: Harkness JA vdVF, Mohler PP, ed. Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002.
Lalwani AK SL, Chiu C. . Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. J Per & Soc Psych. 2009;96:870-882.
Triandis H. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995.
Johnson T KP, Cho YI, Shavitt, S. . The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. J Cross-Cultural Psych. 2005;36:264-277.
Smith P, Bond, MH. Social Psychology Across Cultures. 2nd ed. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1998.
Van Hemert D, Van de Vijver, FJR, Poortinga, YH, Georgas, J. Structure and score levels of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across individuals and countries. Person & Ind Diff. 2002;33:1229–1249.
Chang L. A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. App Psych Measurement. 1994;18(3):205-215.
Yu D, Lee, DTF, Woo, J. Issues and Challenges of Instrument Translation. Western J Nursing Res. 2004;26:307-320.
Brislin R. The wording and translation of research instrument. In: Lonner WJ BJ, ed. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986.
Hui CH TH. Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. J Cross-Cultural Psych. 1989;3:296-309.
Lee JW JP, Mineyama Y, Zhang XE. . Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nursing & Health. 2002;4:295-306.
Field M. The Soviet legacy: The past as prologue. In: Mckee M HJ, Falkingham J, ed. Health Care in Central Asia. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 2002.
Aksholakova A, Ismailova, N. The Language Policy of Kazakhstan and the State Language in Government Service. . Procedia-Social and Behav Sci. 2013;93:1580-1586.
WHO. Risk Factors (Alcohol & Tobacco). 2014; http://www.who.int/countries/kaz/en/. Accessed May 30, 2014.
Aringazina A, Gulis, G, Allegrante, JP Public health challenges and priorities for Kazakhstan. Central Asian J Global Health. 2012;1:1.
Radin D. Too ill to find the cure?: Corruption, institutions, and health care sector performance in the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union. East Euro Pol & Soc. 2009;23:105-125.
Balabanova D, Roberts, B, Richardson, E, Haerpfer, C, McKee, M. Health care reform in the Former Soviet Union: Beyond the transition. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(2):840-864.