Main Article Content
Understanding the disability-poverty relationship among minority groups within the United States (US) populations may help inform interventions aimed at reducing health disparities. Limited information exists on risk factors for disability and poverty among “Central Asians” (immigrants born in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and other Central Asian regions of the former Soviet Union) in the US. The current cross-sectional analysis used information on 6,820 Central Asians to identify risk factors for disability and poverty. Data from the 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) file from the American Community Survey (ACS) indicate that being married, non-Latino-white, and having higher levels of educational attainment are protective against disability and poverty. In contrast, older age, residing in the Middle Atlantic geographic division, and having limited English language ability are risk factors for both disability and poverty. Research should continue to develop risk profiles for understudied immigrant populations. Expanding knowledge on the well-being of Central Asians in the US may help impact public health interventions and inform health policies.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
Dalal AK. Disability–poverty nexus psycho-social impediments to participatory development. Psychol Dev Soc. 2010;22(2):409-437.
Siordia C. Disability prevalence according to a class, race, and sex (CSR) hypothesis. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015;2(3):303-310.
Block P, Balcazar F, Keys C. From pathology to power rethinking race, poverty, and disability. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2001;12(1):18-27.
Braithwaite J, Mont D. Disability and poverty: A survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications. ALTER. 2009;3(3):219-232.
Groce N, Kett M, Lang R, Trani JF. Disability and poverty: The need for a more nuanced understanding of implications for development policy and practice. Third World Quarterly. 2011;32(8):1493-1513.
Loeb M, Eide AH, Jelsma J, Toni MK, Maart S. Poverty and disability in eastern and western cape provinces, South Africa. Disabil Soc. 2008;23(4):311-321.
Lamichhane K, Okubo T. The nexus between disability, education, and employment: Evidence from Nepal. Oxford Development Studies. 2014;42(3):439-453.
Siordia C. Rates of allocation for disability items by mode in the American Community Survey. Issues in Social Science. 2015;3(1):62-82.
Siordia C. Sex-specific disability prevalence in immigrants from China, India, and Mexico and their US-born counterparts. IJHSR. 2015;5(4):267-279.
Curtis KJ, Voss PR, Long DD. Spatial variation in poverty-generating processes: Child poverty in the United States. Soc Sci Res. 2012;41(1):146-159.
Siordia C. Disability estimates between same-sex and different-sex couples: Data from the 2009-2011 American Community Survey. Sex Disabil. 2015;33(1):107-121.
Gryn T, Gambino C. The foreign born from Asia: 2011. American Community Survey Briefs. 2012.
Reamer AD. Surveying for dollars: The role of the American Community Survey in the geographic distribution of federal funds. Washington D. C.: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings;2010.
Siordia C, Le VD. Precision of disability estimates for Southeast Asians in American Community Survey 2008-2010 microdata. CAJGH. 2013;1(2).
Siordia C. A multilevel analysis of mobility disability in the United States population: Educational advantage diminishes as race-ethnicity poverty gap increases. Journal of Studies in Social Science. 2015;12(2):198-219.
Siordia C. Proxy-reports in the ascertainment of disability prevalence with American Community Survey data. J Frailty Aging. 2014;3(4):238-246.
Batalova J. Asian immigrants in the United States. Washington D. C.: Migration Policy Institute;2011.
Mason PL, Matella A. Stigmatization and racial selection after September 11, 2001: Self-identity among Arab and Islamic Americans. IZA Journal of Migration. 2014;3:1-21.
Palmer M. Disability and poverty: A conceptual review. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011;21(4):210-218.
Lustig DC, Strauser DR. Causal relationships between poverty and disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2007;50(4):194-202.
Hansen H, Bourgois P, Drucker E. Pathologizing poverty: New forms of diagnosis, disability, and structural stigma under welfare reform. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:76-83.
Fujiura GT. The political arithmetic of disability and the American family: A demographic perspective. Family Relations. 2014;63(1):7-19.
Goodley D. Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disabil Soc. 2013;28(5):631-644.