Family Medicine as a Model of Primary Health Services Delivery: A Pilot Study in Almaty, Kazakhstan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. Advanced models of delivering primary health care are being implemented in various countries of the world. This is especially true for countries undergoing a healthcare transition in Central Asia, such as Kazakhstan, which obtained independence from Soviet Union in 1991. The Kazakhstan National Program of Health Reform, implemented between 2005-2010, aimed to create an effective system of primary care. One of the key directions of healthcare reform implemented in Kazakhstan included the development of family medicine, which has become cutting-edge agenda for Kazakhstan Health Ministry over the past 10 years. While many papers have been published about the importance of family medicine and primary healthcare models, few have focused on analyzing family medicine effectiveness in Kazakhstan and its impact on access to family doctor services and patient satisfaction. The key aims of this pilot investigation were 1) to assess the model’s impact on access to primary care and patients’ satisfaction, and 2) to explore the model’s effectiveness in some Central Asian and transitional countries in the literature.
Methods. This pilot study was based on semi-structured interviews and questionnaires about the perception and impact of the primary care model to 86 respondents aged 19-51 (54% females, 46% males). The majority of respondents were Almaty city residents (71%), while the rest were Almaty Province rural residents (22%) and residents of other Kazakhstan regions (7%).
Results. Respondents from rural areas associated general practitioners, or family doctors, with community clinics (also referred to as feldsher posts). Even though urban area respondents use family doctor services, they were more likely to get those services in private rather than public clinics. Rural residents appear to have better access to primary care providers than urban residents participating in our study. Also, respondents from rural areas were more satisfied with services provided by family doctors than respondents from urban areas.
Conclusions. This pilot study helped to improve our understanding of primary health care reforms implemented in Kazakhstan, a topic that is not traditionally covered in international literature. This pilot study suggests that primary care is more effectively implemented in rural areas of Kazakhstan (Almaty Province); however, future full-scale research in this area is needed to fully understand the complexity of primary healthcare access in Kazakhstan.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
References
World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund. Primary health care. International Conference on Primary Health Care 1978; http://www.searo.who.int/entity/primary_health_care/documents/hfa_s_1.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2015.
Starfield B. Primary care and health: A cross-national comparison. JAMA. 1991;266(16):2268-2271.
Starfield B. Global health, equity, and primary care. JABFM. 2007;20(6):511-513.
Parfitt B. Health reform: The human resource challenges for Central Asian Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries. Collegian. 2009;16(1):35-40.
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The governmental program on reforming and developing the health care system of Kazakhstan for 2005-2010 periods. 2013; http://ru.government.kz/resources/docs/doc9. Accessed September 8, 2010.
Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: Is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635-641.
Jaén CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: A model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Practice. 1994;38(2):166-171.
Kringos DS, Boerma W, van der Zee J, Groenewegen P. Europe's strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Affair. 2013;32(4):686-694.
Sharman A. Modernization and growth in Kazakhstan. CAJGH. 2012;1(1).
Sharman A. New era in medicine. Central Asia Monitor 2002; http://camonitor.com/archives/3994. Accessed March 31, 2015.
Sharman A. A new paradigm of primary health care in Kazakhstan: Personalized, community-based, standardized, and technology-driven. CAJGH. 2014;3(1).
World Health Organization (WHO). The training and utilization of feldshers in the USSR. 1974; http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/39783/1/WHO_PHP_56.pdf?ua=1. Accessed April 4, 2015.
Groenewegen PP, Dourgnon P, Greß S, Jurgutis A, Willems S. Strengthening weak primary care systems: Steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries. Health Policy. 2013;113(1-2):170-179.
National Programme of Health Reform and Development for 2005-2010. Health Monitor2004.
Katsaga A, Kulzhanov M, Karanikolos M, Rechel B. Kazakhstan: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2012;14(4).
Rawaf S, Maeseneer JD, Starfield B. From Alma-Ata to Almaty: A new start for primary health care. Lancet. 2008;372(9647):1365-1367.
Chan M. Return to Alma-Ata. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):865-866.
Beasley JW, Dovey S, Geffen LN, et al. The contribution of family doctors to primary care research: A global perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks (IFPCRN). Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2004;5:307-316.
World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2000 - Health systems: Improving Health. 2000; http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/. Accessed March 19, 2015.
World Health Organization (WHO). Social determinants of health: The solid facts. 2nd ed: World Health Organization; 2003.
World Bank. Review of experience of family medicine in Europe and Central Asia. Vol 4. Washington, DC: Kyrgyz Republic Case Study; 2005.
UNICEF. UNICEF evaluation report standards. 2004; http://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/files/UNICEF_Eval_Report_Standards.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2015.
World Bank. Review of experience of family medicine in Europe and Central Asia. Vol 1. Washington DC: Executive Summary; 2005.
World Bank. Review of experience of family medicine in Europe and Central Asia. Vol 2. Washington, DC: Armenia Case Study; 2005.
Omarova HP. The need for family doctors in rural area of Turkmenistan. Paper presented at: International Conference N211992; Venesian Medical University.
Turcanu G, Domente S, Buga M, Richardson E. Republic of Moldova: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2012;14(7).
World Health Organization (WHO). Evaluation of structure and provision of primary care in Ukraine: A survey-based project in the regions of Kiev and Vinnitsa. 2010; http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/129022/e94565.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2015.