Estimating Maternal Mortality in Remote Rural Regions: an Application of the Sisterhood Method in Tajikistan

Kylea Laina Liese, Heather Pauls, Sarah Robinson, Crystal Patil

Abstract


Introduction: The sisterhood method of maternal mortality data collection and analysis provides a validated framework for estimating maternal mortality ratios in situations of limited infrastructure. The aim of this study is to assess sub-national maternal mortality in the Badakhshan region of Tajikistan using the sisterhood method as part of a larger ethnographic study on maternal risk.

Methods: In 2006-2007, 1004 married women of reproductive age in Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast, Tajikistan were surveyed using the sisterhood method. Respondents were asked eleven questions about the sex, age and survivorship of all children born to the respondent’s mother.

Results: Using a national total fertility rate (TFR) estimate of 4.88, the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in Tajik Badakhshan was 141 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births (95% CI 49-235). The lifetime risk of maternal death was 1 in 141 (95% CI 34-103).

Conclusion: Given the inherent time-lag of the sisterhood method, precise estimates of maternal mortality are dependent on accurate TFRs, which may vary based upon regional experiences of demographic transitions. Socio-political instability and the dismantling of Soviet welfare programs and civil war following Tajikistan’s independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 likely impacted TFR in Tajik Badakhshan. Socio-political trends influencing TFR in rural regions compared to urban, and the investigation of factors associated with maternal mortality, require additional investigation.


Keywords


Maternal Mortality, Sisterhood Method, Tajikistan, Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blencowe, H., Calvert, C., Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., & Campbell, O. M. Measuring maternal, foetal and neonatal mortality: Challenges and solutions. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2016; 36: 14-29.

Eastwood, R., & Lipton, M. Rural-Urban Dimensions of Inequality Change. Working Papers. UNU/WIDER Publications, Katajanokanlaituri 6 B, 00160, Helsinki, Finland; 2000.

Graham, W., Brass, W., & Snow, R. W. Estimating maternal mortality: the sisterhood method. Studies in family planning. 1989;20(3):125-135

Liese, K. L. Motherdeath in Childbirth: Explaining maternal mortality on the roof of the world. Stanford: Stanford University; 2009.

Smith, J. B., Fortney, J. A., Wong, E., Amatya, R., Coleman, N. A., & Johnson, J. D. G. Estimates of the maternal mortality ratio in two districts of the Brong-Ahafo region, Ghana. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79(5): 400-408.

Hanley, J. A., Hagen, C. A., & Shiferaw, T. Confidence intervals and sample-size calculations for the sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality. Studies in Family Planning. 1996; 220-227.

Graham, W. J., Foster, L. B., Davidson, L., Hauke, E., & Campbell, O. M. Measuring progress in reducing maternal mortality. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2008;22(3): 425-445.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD Edition. 2015.

World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015 Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. WHO: Switzerland; 2015.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2019.341

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.